Screener

Opportunity Score

Funds that are healthy and trading at a discount. A fund only scores high if it has kept its capital intact and its price has also pulled back: a fund that is simply eroding never looks like a bargain here.

Market data as of 08 October 2026

Funds scored
132
bond funds excluded: their price moves with interest rates
Strong opportunities
10
score of 60 or more
Market fear (VIX)
15.4
1.5 of 10 points, the same for every fund
Eroding funds
18
all income needed to offset the price fall: no discount points
1 IncomeShares SLVY Silver+Yield ETF 89 /100 44.9% below its 52-week high, RSI 33 2 IncomeShares GLDI Gold+Yield ETF 76 /100 22.0% below its 52-week high, RSI 35 3 IncomeShares INTY Intel (INTC) ETF 76 /100 25.1% below its 52-week high, RSI 52
Free account

Create a free account to see the whole table

The summary above is open to everyone. the full ranking of healthy funds trading at a discount — with search, filters and sorting — comes with a free account. No password: we send you a sign-in link.

How the score works

RSI is computed on total-return prices (distributions reinvested). AUM trend needs three months of history and is shown for information only: fund flows tend to follow past performance rather than predict it. Not investment advice.

Important information. Master of Yield is an independent research tool. All content on this site, including fund data, screeners, scores, model portfolios and backtests, is provided for information and education only. Nothing here is investment, legal, tax or accounting advice, nor a recommendation or solicitation to buy, sell or hold any financial instrument. We are not a broker, a bank or an authorised investment adviser, and we have no knowledge of your personal circumstances. Any investment decision you make is yours alone: consult a qualified adviser before acting.

Our approach. Our model portfolios follow a purely quantitative, rules-based method focused on income. Funds are selected, ranked and rotated by statistical criteria applied mechanically: price erosion since inception, sustainability of distributions, dividend growth, yield and total return. No discretionary judgement or view on individual companies or markets is involved, and the same rules apply to every fund.

About the backtests. Portfolio results are hypothetical simulations run on historical data, not records of real trades or of any real account. Among other simplifications, they assume every fund could be bought and sold at its month-end price with no spread, commission or market impact; they show figures before tax unless you set your own tax profile under "Taxes", where you choose your country and can adjust every rate and the commission your broker charges per trade — those figures are an estimate, not a tax calculation; and they convert every amount to euro at the daily exchange rate. The fund universe only contains products that exist today, so funds that closed in the past are missing, which tends to flatter results. Many funds have short histories, so some results cover only a few years of a largely rising market. Rules may be refined over time and each refinement is applied to the full history, so past results can change. Past or simulated performance does not guarantee future results, and every investment can lose value, including the capital invested.

About the data. Data is collected from publicly available open sources and third-party providers and is not independently verified. No warranty is given as to its accuracy, completeness or timeliness. Always check figures with the fund provider before acting. Fund reference data (expense ratio, fund size, domicile) is completed with the EU ETF Universe dataset by Danimoth, used under the CC BY 4.0 licence: danimoth.com/dataset.

Intellectual property. Fund names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Content from this site may not be reproduced or redistributed without written permission.