About

Why Master of Yield exists

For decades, living on investment income was a privilege of large fortunes. Income funds that sell options changed the arithmetic — first in the United States, now in Europe. This page explains what changed, why a high yield is not automatically real income, and the four principles the whole site is built on.

Why Master of Yield exists — video

The video loads from YouTube only when you press play. Watch on YouTube.

1. The old world of dividends

Take €1,500 a month — €18,000 a year, before tax. It is roughly what many people in Europe would call a decent salary. The capital you need to collect it from dividends is simple arithmetic: the yearly income divided by the yield.

1.5%
€1,200,000
4%
€450,000
8%
€225,000

The S&P 500 pays a dividend yield of around one and a half percent, often less: more than a million euros for that salary. Even a classic dividend portfolio at 4% needs €450,000. And growing that income took patience — dividends grew a few percent a year, and it could take decades before they meant something in a monthly budget.

≈ €62 a monthWhat €50,000 of savings pays at 1.5%. Nice, but it does not change anything in a family budget. For most people, investment income was something that would happen one day, far in the future.

2. What changed

A new kind of fund arrived: covered-call and put-writing funds, first in the United States and now, more and more, in Europe as UCITS funds that any European investor can buy. Many pay every month, with yields in the double digits. And credit where it is due: their managers do a job that used to require time, skills and an options account.

The fund owns
a stock or an index.
Every month it sells
someone else the right to buy it at a higher price.
The premium
paid for that right becomes your income.

You give up part of the big rallies, and in exchange you are paid every month, whatever the market does. That changes the arithmetic:

1.5%
€1,200,000
4%
€450,000
8%
€225,000
15%
€120,000

This is a form of democratisation: income investing is no longer reserved for the few. Even with smaller capital, income can become a real supplement to a salary and, over time, grow until it covers the expenses. Today Master of Yield tracks 150 UCITS income funds, and the list keeps growing.

Capital figures are arithmetic for €18,000 a year before tax, not projections. Yields of 15% or more are not guaranteed and can come with a falling price — which is the point of section 4.

3. Two philosophies

This is not the only way to invest, and neither philosophy is right or wrong. It depends on the investor.

Philosophy oneAccumulation
  • Usually more capital in the long run
  • Hard to touch without slowing the compounding
  • When you need money, you decide what to sell, and when
  • The textbook answer, and right for many people
Philosophy twoIncome
  • Paid every month, without selling anything
  • Tangible: you spend it or reinvest it, and you watch it grow
  • Part of the capital growth goes into that income
  • In thirty years the final number may be smaller

Many investors end up mixing the two: they accumulate while they work and shift towards income as the years go by, or they build an income sleeve next to a core portfolio. The real question is personal: do you want the largest possible number in thirty years, or an income you can live on — and see growing — along the way?

4. The catch

Here is the part most channels skip: a high yield is not automatically real income. Some funds pay you back your own capital — the distribution is high, but the price keeps falling, year after year. Covered calls also cap the upside, and in a crash the price falls anyway.

100 90 80 70 monthly distributions: high the price: falling, year after year
An illustrative fund over three years, not a real one: +10% paid each year, −12% a year on the price. You were handed back your own money, and lost a little more.
38 of 95funds below their price of a year earlier
(September 2026 report)
14lost money over twelve months
even after every distribution

From the outside, the two situations look the same: the yield is high in both cases. That is exactly why Master of Yield exists.

5. Why strategies

The second reason is discipline. Investing without a strategy is a bet: you buy what is in the news, sell when you are scared, and your results depend on your mood. A strategy is a set of written rules, tested on the past and applied the same way every month.

4,000+rule configurations tested on the whole archive before the strategies on the site were chosen. Every rule is public, and every monthly decision is published with the reason for each fund that enters or leaves.

One example, the rules of Quality Five:

  1. Every month-end
  2. The five best Quality Scores among covered-call funds
  3. A yield of at least 30%
  4. One fund per underlying stock
  5. Kept until it leaves the top seven

Because the rules are fixed, you can test them honestly and see how they behaved in the good years and in the bad ones before putting a single euro on the table.

A strategy does not promise the future: nobody knows what happens next. But rules tested over time can improve your odds, and they replace impulse with method.

6. The four principles of the site

01TransparencyEvery number, gross and net of tax, with the data of every fund.
02Rules, not hypeWritten rules, tested, and no promises.
03Show the catchDrawdowns, erosion and taxes always sit next to the yields.
04Your income, your paceMore income today or more capital tomorrow: we show you where each one leads.

That is why the site shows the bad months as clearly as the good ones. If a strategy fell by 27% from its peak, you read it right next to its income — because an investor who knows the catch in advance is an investor who does not sell at the worst moment.

Master of Yield exists so that income investing is not only for the few, and so that nobody has to do it blind.

Important information. Master of Yield is an independent research tool. All content on this site, including fund data, screeners, scores, model portfolios and backtests, is provided for information and education only. Nothing here is investment, legal, tax or accounting advice, nor a recommendation or solicitation to buy, sell or hold any financial instrument. We are not a broker, a bank or an authorised investment adviser, and we have no knowledge of your personal circumstances. Any investment decision you make is yours alone: consult a qualified adviser before acting.

Our approach. Our model portfolios follow a purely quantitative, rules-based method focused on income. Funds are selected, ranked and rotated by statistical criteria applied mechanically: price erosion since inception, sustainability of distributions, dividend growth, yield and total return. No discretionary judgement or view on individual companies or markets is involved, and the same rules apply to every fund.

About the backtests. Portfolio results are hypothetical simulations run on historical data, not records of real trades or of any real account. Among other simplifications, they assume every fund could be bought and sold at its month-end price with no spread, commission or market impact; they show figures before tax unless you set your own tax profile under "Taxes", where you choose your country and can adjust every rate and the commission your broker charges per trade — those figures are an estimate, not a tax calculation; and they convert every amount to euro at the daily exchange rate. The fund universe only contains products that exist today, so funds that closed in the past are missing, which tends to flatter results. Many funds have short histories, so some results cover only a few years of a largely rising market. Rules may be refined over time and each refinement is applied to the full history, so past results can change. Past or simulated performance does not guarantee future results, and every investment can lose value, including the capital invested.

About the data. Data is collected from publicly available open sources and third-party providers and is not independently verified. No warranty is given as to its accuracy, completeness or timeliness. Always check figures with the fund provider before acting. Fund reference data (expense ratio, fund size, domicile) is completed with the EU ETF Universe dataset by Danimoth, used under the CC BY 4.0 licence: danimoth.com/dataset.

Intellectual property. Fund names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Content from this site may not be reproduced or redistributed without written permission.